Political Panorama Issue No 28
In our earlier article titled “When the Referee
Wears the Team’s Jersey: Why the Appointment of Prof. Joash Ojo Amupitan as
INEC Chairman is a Dangerous Error,” we raised a number of legitimate questions
regarding the propriety and implications of Prof. Amupitan’s appointment as the
new chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
That
piece reflected widespread public apprehension at the time, especially
following unverified claims that Prof. Amupitan had served as a member and a lead counsel of President Bola Tinubu’s legal team during the 2023
Presidential Election Petition Tribunal.
However,
subsequent verifications and official clarifications, including statements from
Mr. Babatunde Ogala, SAN, coordinator of the Tinubu Presidential Legal Team, as
well as fact-checks by multiple reputable national outlets such as ThisDay, The
Nation, The Cable, and Tell.ng have confirmed that Prof. Joash Ojo
Amupitan was not part of the said legal team.
In
light of this discovery, it is only fair and professional to acknowledge that
the earlier information linking him to the tribunal legal team was inaccurate
and unsubstantiated. We, therefore, retract that particular reference and
extend this clarification in the spirit of journalistic integrity and public
accountability.
That
said, this clarification does not, in any way, invalidate the other core issues
earlier raised concerning the integrity of his credentials, the opacity of his
professional trajectory, and the constitutional question of non-partisanship
required for the head of Nigeria’s electoral umpire.
The
grey areas in Prof. Amupitan’s educational and professional records as released
by the State House remain unresolved. There are still no verifiable public
details of the following:
1.The
missing gap in the years (1984 to 1997) he attended and obtained his LL.B
degree at the University of Jos.
2.His
institutional leadership at the same University of Jos vis-à-vis his Ph.D.
degree; and
3.His
record of non-partisanship and civic neutrality, as demanded by Section 154(3)
of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Paragraph 14(2)(a) of the Third
Schedule.
Until
these questions are transparently answered, Prof. Amupitan’s nomination
continues to raise legitimate concerns about the fitness, credibility, and
moral foundation of this critical appointment. The clarification that he did
not serve on Tinubu’s legal team corrects an important detail, but it does not
confer legitimacy on a process still shadowed by opacity.
In
a democracy, perception is as important as fact. For the electoral umpire to
command the trust of Nigerians, the referee must not only be fair, he must be
seen to be fair.
We,
therefore, call on the Presidency to make public, without delay,
all relevant educational and professional records of Prof. Amupitan, so that
Nigerians may judge for themselves the credibility of the man now positioned to
preside over the nation’s next general election.
Failing
such transparency, the appointment remains in both spirit and consequence a
grave misjudgment.
Until next week, this is Political Panorama with Ola Olateju - Voice of the Coalition. Voice of the People.

2 Comments
Most of these questions were treated by his classmate, now SAN in the comments section, it’s good to reflect on it, thanks
ReplyDeleteThank you for your information. Unfortunately, the said classmate's comments did not reflect in our comments section. Kindly do us and the nation a favour by reposting the classmate's comments in the comment section for us to reflect on them. Thank you, once again
Delete