Political Panorama Issue No 17
![]() |
Ambassador Yussuf Tuggar Minister of Foreign Affairs |
Diplomacy on Mute
When President Bola Ahmed Tinubu was
sworn into office on May 29, 2023, expectations were high that Nigeria's
long-diminished foreign policy presence would be revived. His slogan, “Renewed Hope,” promised to reposition Nigeria
as a diplomatic giant in Africa and an articulate voice in the Global South.
But as we clock two full years into his administration, one fact stands
glaring: Nigeria has no officially appointed ambassadors in most of its foreign
missions.
Nigeria - Africa’s most
populous country and its largest economy has failed to appoint substantive
ambassadors to many of its foreign missions. What began as a routine diplomatic
recall in 2023 has since morphed into a prolonged and damaging silence.
In
an interconnected world where global representation is vital to national
interest, Nigeria’s diplomatic absence is not merely symbolic. It is a strategic
self-sabotage.
From
key embassies in North America and Europe to consulates in Asia and Africa,
foreign missions that once served as Nigeria’s outposts for trade, investment,
security, and citizen welfare are now operating like headless bodies. Staff
morale is low. Operations are slow. Visibility is invisible.
This
is more than an administrative oversight. It is a quiet crisis of governance, one
that imperils our national image, endangers our citizens abroad, and signals
confusion at the highest levels of foreign policy planning.
A
Symbolic Absence, A Practical Vacuum
Nigeria’s
failure to appoint ambassadors is not just a bureaucratic delay. It is a
political message. In global diplomacy, the absence of an ambassador signals a
diminished relationship. It tells host countries that Nigeria either lacks
interest or capacity, or both. As former U.S. diplomat John Campbell warned,
“Nigeria’s diplomatic credibility is weakened when missions are
underrepresented” (Council on Foreign Relations, 2023).
In
major capitals like Washington, London, and Beijing where high-level lobbying,
economic negotiations, and diaspora diplomacy are essential, the absence of
presidentially appointed ambassadors leaves Nigeria at a strategic
disadvantage. With ECOWAS under pressure, BRICS expanding its influence, and
continental blocs negotiating trade and security frameworks, Nigeria is missing
from key tables
Tinubu’s
Foreign Policy: Strategy or Stagnation?
Tinubu
has shown flashes of international ambition. He has visited the U.S., France,
Saudi Arabia, and other countries, often with rhetoric about attracting
investment and leading African integration. But diplomacy is not conducted at
presidential summits alone. It is built through day-to-day negotiations,
cultural exchanges, and behind-the-scenes manoeuvres most of which are the
purview of ambassadors.
By
neglecting ambassadorial appointments, the Tinubu administration undermines its
own foreign policy machinery. While the Ministry of Foreign Affairs claims that
security vetting and financial constraints delayed the process (CNBC Africa,
2025), these reasons wear thin in the face of prolonged inaction. Other African
countries, facing equal or greater fiscal constraints, have managed to appoint
and deploy envoys.
Background: When the Silence Began
In
September 2023, the Federal Government recalled all Nigerian ambassadors
worldwide, career and non-career alike. According to the Minister of Foreign
Affairs, Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar, this was to enable a comprehensive
performance review and restructuring.
While
such recalls are not uncommon, what is highly unusual is that no
replacements have been named nearly two years later. No Senate screening
has been conducted. No formal postings announced. No explanation has sufficed.
The
official excuse of “financial constraints” is unconvincing. Nigeria budgeted
₦302 billion for foreign missions in the 2024 appropriation bill. How, then,
does one explain the paralysis?
In
Ottawa, a once-busy Nigerian High Commission now operates without a substantive
envoy. Diplomats act without clear authority. Strategic initiatives, diaspora
engagement, and investor follow-ups are stalled.
In
Nairobi, Lagos-born tech entrepreneur Tunde Odia recounted his frustrations: “I
met the Rwandan ambassador three times in a month. I couldn’t meet mine.
Nigeria’s mission had no ambassador and no answers.”
In
Cairo, a Nigerian student detained during a protest in early 2025 spent three
nights in custody before consular staff could secure his release because there
was no ambassador to escalate the matter through official diplomatic channels.
These
stories are not outliers. They are the norm.
Embassies
are not mere offices. They are the face, voice, and shield of the Nigerian
state. Without ambassadors, they become little more than ghost ships adrift,
demoralized, and diplomatically dumb.
The Cost of Absence: Risks and Repercussions
Nigeria’s
prolonged diplomatic vacuum carries consequences that extend far beyond foreign
ministry spreadsheets. These costs are strategic, economic, and human.
1.
Strategic
Marginalization
Nigeria's
absence at key diplomatic levels weakens its influence in multilateral bodies
such as ECOWAS, the African Union, and the United Nations. Who represents
Nigeria’s nuanced position on the Sahel withdrawal from ECOWAS? Who lobbies for
our developmental interests in Brussels or Geneva?
2.
Diaspora
Disillusionment
The
Nigerian diaspora over 15 million strong is not only a soft-power asset but a
remittance engine, contributing over $20 billion annually to our economy. Yet
in times of crisis or opportunity, they often find themselves abandoned by a
diplomatic system that lacks leadership.
3.
Economic
Stagnation
Diplomacy
fuels trade and investment. Without ambassadors to lead economic missions,
negotiate bilateral agreements, and attend high-level forums, Nigeria is
forfeiting millions in foreign direct investment and strategic partnerships.
4.
Institutional
Demoralization
Dozens
of career ambassadors trained, tested, waiting and languishing in bureaucratic
limbo in Abuja. They are ready to serve, yet remain sidelined due to unclear
political calculations. It is not only wasteful; it is dehumanizing.
Why Has This Happened? A Political Diagnosis
Nigeria’s
foreign policy machinery has long suffered from politicization and neglect.
Ambassadorships are often used as patronage rewards rather than professional
assignments.
But
under the Tinubu administration, this politicization has fused with alarming
indecision.
Some
insiders suggest that the President’s diplomatic appointments are tied to
complex power-balancing within the ruling APC across geopolitical, ethnic, and
personal lines. Others blame a thin bench of foreign policy advisers and a
Minister of Foreign Affairs who, though experienced but appears to lack the
operational clout to drive urgent action.
Whatever
the reasons, the result is clear - Nigeria is not speaking on the global
stage and the world is noticing.
Public Diplomacy as National Branding
In
today’s world, diplomacy is more than protocol and parades. It is
nation-branding. It is about how countries sell their stories, attract
investors, protect citizens, and advance global causes.
Countries
like Rwanda, Ghana, and Kenya have invested heavily in proactive diplomacy.
Their ambassadors are active on social media, appear on CNN, host diaspora
events, and attend tech expos.
Meanwhile,
Nigeria with all its potential is missing from the table.
Historical Resonance and a Moral Calling
Nigeria
once led the charge against apartheid in South Africa. We hosted peace talks in
Liberia and Sierra Leone. We led ECOWAS missions across West Africa. We were
respected.
Have
we forgotten who we are?
The Yoruba proverb reminds us - “Ilu ki i wa lai ni olori" meaning - there is no town without a king. Without diplomatic leadership, Nigeria is exposed strategically and morally. Ambassadors are the eyes and ears of the President of the nation. Their absence means that the President is missing in such a nation, though the country is existing through the leaderless embassies and high commissions.
Call to Action: Let Nigeria Speak Again
The
time for excuses is over. President Tinubu must:
1. Submit ambassadorial nominations to
the Senate immediately.
2. Prioritize merit and representation
in appointments. Not political IOUs.
3. Empower the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs with timely funding, autonomy, and a clear performance mandate.
4. Revive Nigeria’s foreign policy
doctrine, aligning it with contemporary realities.
Above
all, he must understand that diplomacy is not a luxury. It is a nation’s voice.
A Wake-Up Call in the Age of Global Competition
Nigeria
cannot afford to be a silent giant in a world that moves at the speed of
influence. The embassies we ignore today are the crises we will confront
tomorrow when trade dries up, diaspora turns bitter, and geopolitical foes
outmaneuver us.
Let
this be a turning point. Let Nigeria speak again. Not in whispers, not in
delays, but in full diplomatic force.
- watching the horizon, one controversy at a time
www.politicalpanorama.com.ng
2 Comments
i think the president is not a man of his words in the first place,he has to keep to all the promises he made during campaign to revive nigeria and not finally destroy it
ReplyDeleteThe more reason we all need to rise as a people and elect a more dependable, reliable and competent leader in 2027
Delete